Biological data collected aboard the NOAA Ship NANCY FOSTER during cruise #NF0705, March 30th - April 10th, 2007 and during larval collections in Brewer's Bay, St. Thomas April 12 - 19th, 2007

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Biological data collected aboard the NOAA Ship NANCY FOSTER during cruise #NF0705, March 30th - April 10th, 2007 and during larval collections in Brewer's Bay, St. Thomas April 12 - 19th, 2007
Abstract:
Biological data collected from plankton collecting gear aboard the NOAA Ship NANCY FOSTER during cruise #NF0705, March 30th - April 10th, 2007 as part of the Coral Reef Ecosystem Research (CRER) project and from inshore larval collections in Brewer's Bay, St. Thomas April 12-19th, 2007. Data are in spreadsheet format. Each file contains a header that describes the column data within.
Supplemental_Information:
Biological data collected aboard the NOAA Ship NANCY FOSTER during cruise #NF0705, March 30th - April 10th, 2007

Biological data collected during larval collections in Brewer's Bay, St. Thomas April 12 -19th, 2007.Gear used was light traps, channel nets and beach seine

  1. How might this data set be cited?
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Southeast Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), NOAA's Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR), Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory (AOML), Unpublished material, Biological data collected aboard the NOAA Ship NANCY FOSTER during cruise #NF0705, March 30th - April 10th, 2007 and during larval collections in Brewer's Bay, St. Thomas April 12 - 19th, 2007.

    Other_Citation_Details:
    DATASET CONTRIBUTORS:

    John Lamkin, Trika Gerard, Estrella Malca, Akihiro Shiroza (NOAA/NMFS/SEFSC and NOAA/OAR/AOML)

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -67.16
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -62.66
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 18.55
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 17.35
  3. What does it look like?
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Beginning_Date: 30-Mar-2007
    Ending_Date: 19-Apr-2007
    Currentness_Reference: ground condition
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    Fish identification data for stations at which a MOCNESS, Bongo or inshore gear was deployed including lowest identifiable taxa when possible. Abundances provided.

    See the header of data file for complete description of data fields...

    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation: NOAA

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Southeast Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC), Early Life History Dynamics Team (ELH)
    Attn: Trika Gerard
    5 Virginia Beach Drive
    Miami, FL
    USA

    305-361-4493 (voice)

Why was the data set created?

The United States Virgin Islands' (USVI) Grammanik Bank, located to the south of St. Thomas, is the site of multi-species spawning aggregation for economically important fish including yellowfin grouper, Nassau grouper, tiger grouper, and dog snapper. Fishing pressure at this suspected source of larval recruits prompted the Caribbean Fisheries Council in 2004 to close the bank yearly from February - April. A series of banks south of the USVI (St. Thomas and St. John) and the British Virgin Islands (BVI) provide similar habitats and spawning aggregation sites. Unfortunately, the biological and physical processes which drive production on these banks, the circulation connecting these banks, and the flows across these banks have yet to be quantified. Absent such data, management decisions (including Marine Protected Area [MPA] designations and temporary closures) are presently based on professional judgment rather than quantifiable, defensible scientific information.

To address this data gap, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) scientists from the Southeast Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC) and Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory (AOML) in Miami, Florida, working with scientists from the University of the Virgin Islands (UVI) in St. Thomas will be conducting a three-year interdisciplinary research project using the R/V NANCY FOSTER to conduct biological and physical oceanographic surveys of the Virgin Islands' (VI) bank ecosystems and surrounding regional waters. The long-term sustainability of fisheries in the VI and surrounding regions will depend on a comprehensive understanding of regional spawning aggregations, larval transport, and overall larval recruitment in the study area.

The project will be directed at answering one over-arching question: How are unprotected VI banks, MPAs such as the Hind Bank Marine Conservation District, seasonally closed areas such as the Grammanik Bank, and inshore areas ecologically linked via regional reef fish larval dispersal, transport, and life-history patterns?

To gain the information necessary to develop more specific hypotheses, the first research cruise of this project was conducted between March 30, 2007 and April 10, 2007 aboard the R/V NANCY FOSTER. This survey sampled water properties, currents, and dispersal and transport of settlement-stage larvae in the VI and neighboring regions. It should yield not only an understanding of regional spatial variation in the supply of settlement-stage fishes, but also insights into the relative importance of Grammanik Bank and its MPAs as a source of juvenile fishes recruiting to the waters of the VI. Specifically, the cruise will address the following questions:

1) How do the abundance and composition of ichthyoplankton around Grammanik Bank and other similar banks change with space and time? 2) How much of this variation in abundance and composition can be explained by the oceanographic setting? 3) How do the oceanography and ichthyoplankton assemblages interface with the boundary areas of seasonally or permanently closed MPAs?

This survey included neuston, bongo, and MOCNESS trawl tows, as well as CTDO2/LADCP casts measuring, temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, light transmission, chlorophyll, and water velocity. Continuous surface measurements of temperature, salinity, light transmission, chlorophyll, and water velocity werel also collected via the ship's flow-through system and hull-mounted ADCP. Satellite imagery of sea surface temperature, altimetry, and ocean color was used to aid in the interpretation of and extrapolation from shipboard observations.

Identification and analysis of samples and shipboard data analysis commenced immediately after the cruise and should be completed by the end of 2009.

Initially, the success of the project will be measured by the extent of the surveys made and the number of samples collected, as well as the utility and quality of useful information generated from analysis of the data collected. Settlement-stage larvae collected from inshore sampling will constitute another measure of success for the field study portion of this project. Determination of the utility of stable isotope analysis of these larvae will provide an additional benchmark. The synthesis of these data, to determine the location and relative importance of spawning sites, and the incorporation of this information into fisheries oceanographic models that help local resource managers in making decisions as to MPA sites and optimal seasonal closures with respect to time and place, will provide the ultimate measure of project success. In addition, it is our intention that all data generated and analyzed will be published in peer-reviewed literature. We consider this an essential step both to guarantee data quality and to assure that management decisions based on this information are defensible.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: Unknown (process 1 of 1)
    Net / Trawl Operations: Operations varied, utilizing either neuston, bongo, Methot, or 1 meter Multiple Opening and Closing Net Environmental Sampling System (MOCNESS) . Trawl type and location was dependent on the work area (depth). Plankton samples were collected at sea and preserved in Ethanol. Light trap, channel net operations were done daily and consisted of larval fish collections. Seine tows were done three times around the new moon to monitor recruitment of settlement size fishes. Sorting and identification of larval fish began immediately. All data was stored in a spreadsheet format and updated as samples were completed.
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
    Data have been processed using standard methodology with regard to plankton samples and identifications of fishes are ongoing with trained personnel.
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
    The exact location of each tow (either MOCNESS, or Bongo) cast is shown in the spreadsheet. This location is determined from the ship's GPS and should be considered very accurate.The exact location of each station (light trap) is shown in the spreadsheet, locations were determined from the vessel's GPS and should be considered accurate.

    Positions of net casts recoreded in the data files correspond with the beginning of each cast. As the ship may drift on station, the position of the net will change in time over the course of the cast. As such the position information is only accurate for the beginning of the cast (i.e. when the net first enters the water). This accuracy is on the order of 10 meters. Positions of inshore collections is in the order of 5 meters due to the shifting wind and current at each station.

    Geographical accuracy was determined by GPS NMEA data.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
    pressures (depth proxy) are determined using the MOCNESS pressure sensor.Depth of inshore stations was determined using the vessel's built in sounder.

    pressures (depth proxy) are accurate to within 1db

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
    N/A
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?
    N/A

How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints: N/A
Use_Constraints: N/A
  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)
    NOAA/SEFSC/ELH
    Attn: Trika Gerard
    75 Virginia Beach Drive
    Miami, FL
    USA

    305-361-4493 (voice)
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set? Offline Data
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    Data were collected for scientific purposes only and should only be used for general scientific interest/endeavours. NOAA/OAR/AOML & NOAA/NMFS/SEFSC cannot be held liable for use of these data in any other manner.
  4. How can I download or order the data?
  5. Is there some other way to get the data?
    Please contact the distributor (see above).

Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 29-Mar-2020
Last Reviewed: 07-Apr-2009
Metadata author:
NOAA/SEFSC/ELH
75 Virginia Beach Drive
Miami, FL
USA

305-361-4493 (voice)
Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)

Generated by mp version 2.9.48 on Thu Mar 28 11:04:08 2024