Biodiversity of Freshwater and Estuarine Communities in Lower Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii with Observations on Introduced Species: Summary from Fieldwork Conducted in 1997-1998 (NODC Accession 0001114)

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Biodiversity of Freshwater and Estuarine Communities in Lower Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii with Observations on Introduced Species: Summary from Fieldwork Conducted in 1997-1998 (NODC Accession 0001114)
Abstract:
The Pearl Harbor Biodiversity Project was funded by the Department of Defense Legacy Program, through the U. S. Navy. The project was performed in two phases. Phase I of the study was conducted from November 1995 through June 1997. Phase I involved investigations of the marine organisms of Pearl Harbor, with emphasis on detection of nonindigenous marine organisms that may have become established in the harbor over the past century. Fieldwork for the Phase II investigations commenced in November 1997 and ended in October 1998. Phase II studies investigated the estuarine and freshwater areas of the mouths of streams that enter the harbor's three main lochs. Data were taken at 16 stations.

This dataset contains observations from Phase II.

Supplemental_Information:
Entry_ID Unknown Sensor_Name seine nets, seive filter, dredge Source_Name manual Project_Campaign: Department of Defense Legacy Project Number 106 Originating_Center Bishop Museum Storage_Medium PDF, MS Access Online_size: 5348 Kbytes
  1. How might this data set be cited?
    Ronald A. Englund (primary reporting author) Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawaii, D.J. Preston (co-author) Bishop Museum, R. Wolff (co-author) Bishop Museum, L.G. Eldredge (co-author) Bishop Museum, S.L. Coles (co-author) Bishop Museum, and co-author: K. Arakaki Bishop Museum, 200002, Biodiversity of Freshwater and Estuarine Communities in Lower Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii with Observations on Introduced Species: Summary from Fieldwork Conducted in 1997-1998 (NODC Accession 0001114): none none, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -158.0249
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -157.9472
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 21.3911
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 21.3358
  3. What does it look like?
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Beginning_Date: 03-Nov-1997
    Beginning_Time: 0800
    Ending_Date: 04-Nov-1998
    Ending_Time: 1700
    Currentness_Reference: Ground condition
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    Data received in MS Access database format. Each table in the database was saved as an Excel spreadsheet. For each spreadsheet, a redundant ASCII CSV file was created. Reports were received in PDF format.

    Files within each directory are:

    ./data/Access: PearlHarbor-97.mdb*

    ./data/Excel: Class_and_Order.csv* Class_and_Order.xls* PH_Complete_Taxon.csv* PH_Complete_Taxon.xls* all_fauna_id.csv* all_fauna_id.xls* guts_data.csv* guts_data.xls* station.csv* station.xls*

    ./data/reports: PearlFinal.pdf* estuaries_pearl_harbor.pdf

    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation: None

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
    Department of Defense Legacy Project Number 106 and Department of Natural Sciences Bernice P. Bishop Museum
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    Ronald A. Englund
    Bishop Museum
    1525 Bernice St.
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    USA

    (808)847-8277 (voice)
    englund@bishopmuseum.org

Why was the data set created?

Document the history, cause, and extent of non-native species introductions in the freshwater streams and estuarine areas of Pearl Harbor.

How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: unknown (process 1 of 1)
    A. Literature Search Numerous sources of information on the environmental conditions and biological communities of Pearl Harbor were examined. Literature consulted included published papers in the scientific literature, taxonomy-based monographs and books reporting organisms collected from Pearl Harbor, and unpublished reports of environmental studies in the estuarine regions of Pearl Harbor performed by and for the U.S. Navy, Hawaii Division of Aquatic Resources, and private organizations. Environmental reports and environmental impact statements and assessments were reviewed from AECOS Inc., Bishop Museum, University of Hawaii Library, Hawaiian Electric Co. Environmental Department, and Pacific Aquatic Environmental, Inc. An annotated bibliography of all the literature assembled is presented in Appendix A of the final report.

    B. Bishop Museum Collections The Bishop Museum collections of aquatic insects, mollusks, other invertebrates, and fishes were reviewed for all estuarine and freshwater organisms historically collected from Pearl Harbor wetlands, springs, and fresh and estuarine portions of streams entering Pearl Harbor. For the mollusk and fish collections this involved searching the collection catalogs for specimens that were collected from Pearl Harbor and entering into a database species name, year of collection, and collectors names. The combined data from all sources were assembled into a relational database of Pearl Harbor freshwater and estuarine organisms.

    C. Field Surveys- General Methods Sampling for Phase II of the Pearl Harbor Biodiversity Project began in October 1997 and ended in August 1998. Representative sampling stations were established in each major Pearl Harbor stream and wetland. Sampling locations were somewhat dependent upon the constraints of private property, water depth, sediment depth, and vegetation, but included a complete range of estuarine habitats. Riparian vegetation composition and stream substrate were evaluated at each sampling station. Habitat condition for native aquatic organisms was evaluated both within sampling stations and throughout the study area. Most sampling stations were generally at or just above sea level.

    Insect Sampling

    Aquatic insect sampling was conducted according to Polhemus (1995) and Englund et al. (1998). Collections of both immature and adult specimens were made with aerial sweep nets, aquatic dip nets, seines, and by taking benthic samples. Visual observations of aquatic insects were also conducted above the waterbody. In addition, the sampling of damselflies and dragonflies (Odonata) was emphasized as several of these are currently candidate threatened or endangered species. All insect specimens were stored in 75% ethanol and subsequently transported to the Bishop Museum Entomology Collection for curation and identification. Voucher specimens are currently housed in the Bishop Museum collections.

    We also collected and identified the predominant terrestrial insects on vegetation immediately in the vicinity of riparian habitats, as some riparian insects were an important part of fish diet in the lower reaches of Pearl Harbor streams.

    Benthic Sampling

    Bottom communities in the soft-sediment areas of streams were sampled with a Wildco Petite Ponar@ 15.2 x 15.2 cm (6 x 6 in) weighted dredge. Three dredge samples were collected at each Pearl Harbor stream mouth and were usually taken from the Chevron petroleum pipeline bridge crossing areas. After collection of the dredge samples, sediments were rinsed out through a fine- meshed 1 x 1 mm (0.04 x 0.04 in) seive. The contents were preserved in 75% ethanol for later laboratory analysis.

    Fish, Crustacean, and Mollusk Sampling

    Seine netting was the main sampling technique used to assess introduced fish abundance. A fine- mesh, 5 m (16.4 ft) long seine was used to sample stream animals and assess species composition, and dip nets were also used to sample areas not accessible to seines. Experimental gill nets of varying sized mesh were also used in areas that were too deep to seine. Salinity was also recorded at least once for each stream location sampled, and, unless otherwise stated, salinities were taken at the surface. Because of poor water visibility throughout the Pearl Harbor estuaries, snorkeling was used only in the area of the concrete weir at Waikele Stream. In other areas, above-water observations for fish and invertebrates were occasionally possible, although species identification was generally assessed through capture of individuals. Electrofishing in conjunction with the Hawaii Division of Aquatic Resources was attempted but was not successful because most areas sampled during this study had detectable levels of salinity. Even the small amount of salinity at the Waiawa Springs complex (2 to 4 ppt) rendered electrofishing completely ineffective. Although some fish, crustacean, and mollusk species were identifiable in the field, many smaller specimens were immediately preserved in 75% ethanol and brought back to the Bishop Museum for further identification. The estuarine areas of Waikele, Waiawa, and Halawa Streams, and the Waiawa Springs outlet were accessed by kayak. Visual observations and salinity measurements of aquatic biota were also made while kayaking to the tidal flats. For this report, we used the scientificand common names of fishes published by the American Fisheries Society (American Fisheries Society 1991 ), crustaceans (American Fisheries Society 1989), and Nishida (1997) for insect names and biogeographic status. Many of the organisms discussed in this report do not have common names. For those species having a common name, a general common name (e.g., moth) is used, and after that the organism is referred to by its scientific name.

    Fish Diet Analysis

    A small sub-sample of native and introduced fish collected in the lower stream, wetland, and estuarine regions of Pearl Harbor were preserved in 75% ethanol after capture for later stomach content analysis. Fish stomach contents were identified to the lowest possible level, although in many cases identification to the species level of partially digested prey items and smaller crustaceans such as amphipods and ostracods was not possible. Total prey item numbers in each fish stomach were recorded. Head capsules were counted to assess prey item numbers if stomach contents were broken into pieces. The terrestrial or acquatic status was determined for each identifiable prey item found in fish stomachs. Person who carried out this activity:

    Ronald A. Englund
    Bishop Museum
    1525 Bernice St.
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    USA

    (808)847-8277 (voice)
    englund@bishopmuseum.org
    Data sources used in this process:
    • Englund, R.A. and D.J. Preston, R. Wolff, S.L. Coles, L.G. Eldredge, K. Arakaki, 2000. Biodiversity of Freshwater and Estuarine Communities in Lower Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii with Observations on Introduced Species. Final Report prepapred for the U.S. Navy. Bishop Museum Techincal Report 16: 181 pp. Englund, R.A., 2002. The loss of native biodiversity and continuing nonindigenous species introductions in freshwater, esturine, and wetland communities of Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaiian Islands. Estuaries. Vol. 25, No. 3. p. 418-430.
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
    the survey was 100% completed
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?
    see Methodology

How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints: Dataset credit required
  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)
    NOAA/NESDIS/NODC/NCDDC (National Coastal Data Development Center)
    National Coastal Data Development Center, Building 1100
    Stennis Space Center, MS

    866-732-2382 (voice)
    228-688-2968 (FAX)
    ncddcgetdata@noaa.gov
    Hours_of_Service: 8am-5pm, Monday through Friday
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set? Downloadable Data
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    NOAA makes no warranty regarding these data,expressed or implied, nor does the fact of distribution constitute such a warranty. NOAA, NESDIS, NODC and NCDDC cannot assume liability for any damages caused by any errors or omissions in these data, nor as a result of the failure of these data to function on a particular system.
  4. How can I download or order the data?

Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 06-Jan-2021
Last Reviewed: 03-Aug-2009
Metadata author:
Mr. Patrick C. Caldwell
NOAA/NESDIS/NODC/NCDDC
Hawaii/US Pacific Liaison
1000 Pope Road, MSB 316
Honolulu, Hawaii
USA

(808)-956-4105 (voice)
(808) 956-2352 (FAX)
caldwell@hawaii.edu
Hours_of_Service: 8 AM to 5 PM weekdays
Contact_Instructions: check services@nodc.noaa.gov if not available
Metadata standard:
FGDC CSDGM (FGDC-STD-001-1998)

Generated by mp version 2.9.48 on Thu Mar 28 11:04:11 2024