Nonindigenous Freshwater and Estuarine Species Introductions and their Potential to Affect Sportfishing in the Lower Stream and Estuarine Regions of the South and West Shores of Oahu, Hawaii: Data from 1998-1999 (NODC Accession 0001116)

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Nonindigenous Freshwater and Estuarine Species Introductions and their Potential to Affect Sportfishing in the Lower Stream and Estuarine Regions of the South and West Shores of Oahu, Hawaii: Data from 1998-1999 (NODC Accession 0001116)
Abstract:
Surveys of native and non-indigenous species along the south and west shores of Oahu (excluding Pearl Harbor) were funded by a grant from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation with matching Dingell-Johnson funding provided by the Hawaii Department of Natural Resources, Division of Aquatic Resources. This project was performed in two sections. The first section of this project involved investigations of marine organisms in harbors of the south and west shores of Oahu, with an emphasis on the detection of nonindigenous marine organisms. This dataset has been separately contributed to the NOAA archive. The current study investigated the estuarine and freshwater areas at the mouths of streams and coastal wetlands along the south and west shore of Oahu to investigate the known or potential impacts of introduced species on sportfish. The study area extended from Kaena Point to Makapuu Point. The first comprehensive biological surveys of south and west shore Oahu coastal wetlands, lower stream reaches, and estuarine areas revealed an ecologically degraded fauna dominated by introduced species in freshwater, but ecosystems that are more intact as waters becomes more marine. During this study the first collection of the introduced jaguar cichlid ( Cichlasoma managuense) from an Oahu stream (Manoa/Palolo) was made, and this species appears to have spread from the nearby quarry pond at the University of Hawaii. In strictly freshwater areas of the south and west shore of Oahu most taxa identifiable to the species level were introductions. The majority of introduced species appear to be the primarily the result of aquarium releases, intentional biocontrol releases, and intentional food source releases. Although some introduced species may have originated from marine water releases or hull fouling organisms these points of origin probably contributed only a small fraction of overall nonindigenous species introductions in south and west shore Oahu streams, wetlands, and estuaries.
Supplemental_Information:
Entry_ID Unknown Sensor_Name seine nets Source_Name manual Project_Campaign: Department of Natural Resources, Division of Aquatic Resources Originating_Center Bishop Museum Storage_Medium PDF, MS Access Online_size: 10439 Kbytes
  1. How might this data set be cited?
    primary reporting author: Ronald A. Englund Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawaii, co-author: D.J. Preston Bishop Museum, co-author: L.G. Eldredge Bishop Museum, co-author: S.L. Coles Bishop Museum, and co-author: K. Arakaki Bishop Museum, 200002, Nonindigenous Freshwater and Estuarine Species Introductions and their Potential to Affect Sportfishing in the Lower Stream and Estuarine Regions of the South and West Shores of Oahu, Hawaii: Data from 1998-1999 (NODC Accession 0001116): none none, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -158.2279
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -157.6616
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 21.5271
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 21.2700
  3. What does it look like?
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Beginning_Date: 02-Feb-1998
    Beginning_Time: 0800
    Ending_Date: 08-Jun-1999
    Ending_Time: 1700
    Currentness_Reference: Ground condition
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    Data received in MS Access database format. Each table in the database was saved as an Excel spreadsheet. For each spreadsheet, a redundant ASCII CSV file was created. Report received in PDF format.

    Files within each directory are:

    .data/Access: SouthShore-97.mdb

    .data/Excel: DJ_Fauna.csv DJ_Fauna.xls Id_affiliates.csv Id_affiliates.xls Keith_DJ_Fauna.csv Keith_DJ_Fauna.xls Keith_Insect_Data.csv Keith_Insect_Data.xls Keith_Revised_Insect_Data2.csv Keith_Revised_Insect_Data2.xls Keith_Revised_Species_List.csv Keith_Revised_Species_List.xls Keith_Stations2.csv Keith_Stations2.xls Station.csv Station.xls Stream_Code.csv Stream_Code.xls Taxonomy_and_Author.csv Taxonomy_and_Author.xls

    .data/reports: DJFinal.pdf

    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation: None

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
    The project was funded by a grant from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation with matching Dingell-Johnson funding provided by the Hawaii Department of Natural Resources, Division of Aquatic Resources.
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    Ronald A. Englund
    Bishop Museum
    Marine biologist
    1525 Bernice St.
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    USA

    (808)847-8277 (voice)
    englund@bishopmuseum.org

Why was the data set created?

To investigate the known or potential impacts of introduced species on sportfish.

How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: unknown (process 1 of 1)
    A. Bishop Museum Collections The Bishop Museum collections of aquatic insects, mollusks and other invertebrates, and fishes were reviewed for all estuarine and freshwater organisms historically collected from the south shore Oahu. For the mollusk and fish collections this involved searching the collection catalogs for specimens that were collected from south shore Oahu and entering into a database species name, year of collection, and collectors names. The combined data from all sources were assembled into a relational database of South shore Oahu estuarine organisms. The results of the historical searches of the Bishop Collections can be found in Coles et al. (1999).

    B. Field Surveys- General Methods Sampling for Phase II of the South Shore Oahu Biodiversity Project began in January 1998 and ended in June 1999. Representative sampling stations were established in the lowest reaches of each named south and west Oahu stream. Sampling locations were somewhat dependent upon the constraints of private property, water depth, sediment depth, and vegetation, but included a complete range of estuarine habitats. Riparian vegetation composition and stream substrate were evaluated at each sampling station. Habitat condition for native aquatic organisms was evaluated at sampling stations. Most sampling stations were generally at or just above sea level.

    Insect Sampling Aquatic insect sampling was conducted according to Polhemus (1995a) and Englund et al. (1998). Collections of both immature and adult specimens were made with aerial sweep nets, aquatic dip nets, seines, and benthic samples. Visual observations of aquatic insects were also conducted above the waterbody. Sampling of damselflies and dragonflies (Odonata) was emphasized, as several of these are currently candidate threatened or endangered species. All insect specimens were stored in 75% ethanol and transported to the Bishop Museum Entomology Collection for curation and identification. Voucher specimens are currently housed in the Bishop Museum collections.

    Fish, Crustacean, and Mollusk Sampling Seine netting was the main sampling technique used to assess introduced fish abundance. A fine-mesh, 5 m long seine was used to sample stream animals and assess species composition, and dip nets were also used to sample areas not accessible to seines. Experimental gill nets of varying sized mesh were also used in areas that were too deep to seine. Salinity was also recorded at least once for each stream location sampled, and, unless otherwise stated, salinities were taken at the surface. Electroshocking was attempted but abandoned as most sampling areas were estuarine and even low salinity levels rendered electrofishing ineffective. Snorkeling was not possible because of poor water clarity and quality throughout many south shore Oahu estuaries. In some areas above-water observations for fish and invertebrates were occasionally possible, although species identification was generally assessed through capture of individuals.

    Although some fish, crustacean, and mollusk species were identifiable in the field, many smaller specimens were immediately preserved in 75% ethanol and brought back to the Bishop Museum for further identification. For this report, we used the scientific and common names of fishes published by the American Fisheries Society (American Fisheries Society 1991 ), crustaceans (American Fisheries Society 1989), and Nishida (1997) for insect names and biogeographic status. Person who carried out this activity:

    Ronald A. Englund
    Bishop Museum
    1525 Bernice St.
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    USA

    (808)847-8277 (voice)
    englund@bishopmuseum.org
    Data sources used in this process:
    • Englund, R.A., K. Arakaki, D.J. Preston, S.L. Coles & L.G. Eldredge. 2000. Nonindigenous freshwater and estuarine species introductions and their potential to affect sportfishing in the lower stream and estuarine resions of the south and west shores of Oahu, Hawaii. Final report to Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Aquatic Resources. Bishop Museum Technical Report 17: viii, 121 pp.
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
    the survey was 100% completed
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?
    see Methodology

How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints: Dataset credit required
  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)
    NOAA/NESDIS/NODC/NCDDC (National Coastal Data Development Center)
    National Coastal Data Development Center, Building 1100
    Stennis Space Center, MS

    866-732-2382 (voice)
    228-688-2968 (FAX)
    ncddcgetdata@noaa.gov
    Hours_of_Service: 8am-5pm, Monday through Friday
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set? Downloadable Data
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    NOAA makes no warranty regarding these data,expressed or implied, nor does the fact of distribution constitute such a warranty. NOAA, NESDIS, NODC and NCDDC cannot assume liability for any damages caused by any errors or omissions in these data, nor as a result of the failure of these data to function on a particular system.
  4. How can I download or order the data?

Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 06-Jan-2021
Last Reviewed: 05-Jan-2009
Metadata author:
Mr. Patrick C. Caldwell
NOAA/NESDIS/NODC/NCDDC
Hawaii/US Pacific Liaison
1000 Pope Road, MSB 316
Honolulu, Hawaii
USA

(808)-956-4105 (voice)
(808) 956-2352 (FAX)
caldwell@hawaii.edu
Hours_of_Service: 8 AM to 5 PM weekdays
Contact_Instructions: check services@nodc.noaa.gov if not available
Metadata standard:
FGDC CSDGM (FGDC-STD-001-1998)

Generated by mp version 2.9.48 on Wed Apr 17 11:12:49 2024